خوش آمدید

Will there be better China Plug-In Terminal Blocks company in the future? HPQN, we will wait and see. · Design Principles Since Paul Neill invented the N-type connector in Bell Labs in the 1940s, the N-type connector has achieved the current excellent electrical performance through continuous improvement by engineers. The double-tooth ring disc-shaped locking piece on the male head is fastened on the inclined surface of the female head, and the end of its inteal teeth faces the female head to produce a thrust effect, so that the end faces of the outer conductor are in close contact with the gap being 0. Fig.

This design conforms to the basic principles of RF connector design, so compared to QN, SnapN The scope of application is wider. Obviously, a pair of It is unacceptable that the joint requires 100N of force. But it cannot be said that HPQN will definitely become the ultimate substitute for N.

This design utilizes the elastic force of the inteal teeth of the double-tooth ring disc-shaped locking piece and the supporting force of the female head slope, cleverly achieving the holding force and contact pressure between the male and female end faces, and can achieve very good shock resistance effect. There is a problem: the characteristic impedance of A3 at the contact point is still not continuous, and the high frequency characteristics are still poor.

Based on the performance of the current N-type connector, we believe that the design of QUICK LOCK-N should follow the following two principles: 1) Maintain the basic performance of the N-type connector, such as performance parameters, electrical properties, mechanical properties, and protection levels. In terms of manufacturing costs, SnapN has no advantage over QN, or even slightly exceeds it. The huge demand in the QL-CONNECTOR market has allowed manufacturers to launch three QL-N designs in just a few years. · HPQN (Figure 5) Following SnapN, Anoison introduced the HPQN design in 2007.